Table of Contents
- Start Here
- Spaceship Earth
- Hot Topics
- Climate Science
- Climate Restoration
Energy Sector Disruptors
“One cannot change an existing system; one must create a new system that makes the old system obsolete.” – Buckminster Fuller.
Implications of Climate Change on the Energy Sector
Energy sector analysts expect the next decade to see incredible disruption. The potential for emerging technologies to galvanize a shift away from fossil and nuclear fuels has never been greater. Simultaneously, according to many researchers the mission is already quite literally and certainly impossible. We are just 2 minutes to midnight in what researchers are calling the Anthropocene, Plutocene, or sixth mass extinction. GreenBiz author, Nigel Topping, sums it up as follows, “the need to act on climate change is the greatest potential cause of disruption faced by new and established businesses alike, and is also the greatest catalyst for innovation for those willing to harness it.”
Accenture is a multinational Fortune Global 500 company that provides services in strategy, consulting, digital, technology and operations. Accenture has developed a Disruptability Index to better understand the current level of disruption in the industries they serve and their susceptibility to disruption in the future. They discovered that the energy sector sits high in the volatility quadrant, where historic strengths can become areas of weaknesses. Out of 20 industries assessed, the energy sector rated as the most susceptible to future disruption (see chart):
According to Europeanclimate.org on Implications of Climate Change for the Energy Sector:
- Energy demand is increasing globally, causing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the energy sector also to increase. The trend is set to continue, driven primarily by economic growth and the rising population.
- Climate change presents increasing challenges for energy production and transmission. A progressive temperature increase, an increasing number and severity of extreme weather events and changing precipitation patterns will affect energy production and delivery. The supply of fossil fuels, and thermal and hydropower generation and transmission, will also be affected. However, adaptation options exist.
- Significant cuts in GHG emissions from energy can be achieved through a variety of measures.
- Incentivising investment in low-carbon technologies will be a key challenge for governments and regulators to achieve carbon reduction targets. Reducing GHG emissions also brings important co-benefits such as improved health and employment, but supply-side mitigation measures also carry risks.
Scientists, journalists, writers and researchers from many fields are proclaiming that solving the climate crisis means solving the energy crisis. It is clear that we will need energy solutions that can crack potentially the most impossible problem humanity has ever faced. This will require
At the same time, we must also take care that being realistic doesn’t mean that we “stop being ambitious,” because “this kind of realism, applied to the climate and ecological emergencies, sends the message that we’re screwed,” says
“Spiritually and emotionally it’s not in my makeup to accept defeat, so I have a problem with this, especially before we’ve even begun the rapid transition needed to tackle the climate emergency.” – Guy Dauncey
In this article in The Tyee, “OK Doomer,” Guy Dauncey introduces us to futuristic ways of thinking about integrating smart cities, renewables, the coming disruptions, and green energy economies. He says, “taken together, walkable cities, cycling, transit, EVs, heat pumps and Passive Homes offer an 80 to 90-per-cent energy descent without a single comfortable life being wrecked. So enough with the fear mongering.”
The Edge of Disruption
Another future thinker, Tony Seba is the author of “Clean Disruption of Energy and Transportation”, “Solar Trillions” and “Winners Take All.” He is a serial Silicon Valley entrepreneur and an instructor in Entrepreneurship, Disruption and Clean Energy at Stanford’s Continuing Studies Program. Seba says we are now on the edge of disruption (video) across the energy sector with never before thought possible technologies about to enter the picture.
The new tech, says Seba, will happen for purely economic reasons in the current market system. Seba says, just ask yourself, why do businesses automate? It’s simple, they do this in order to lower their marginal costs of operation. This is the cost to produce an additional unit after the fixed costs of infrastructure. In the following video lecture, Seba introduces the new world of lost cost, clean energy disruption set to automate the future:
Further according to Seba, “overwhelming evidence points in one clear direction: the industrial age of energy and transportation will be over by 2030. Exponentially improving technologies such as solar, electric vehicles, and autonomous (self-driving) cars will transform the energy and transportation industries as we know it. This disruption is inevitable and it will be swift. This is the clean disruption of energy and transportation” (video). As we transition into the digital autonomous era over the next decade things are projected to get cheaper to produce. As this trend permeates the value chains of our society we are rapidly approaching a new economic reality where these costs are approaching zero. That is what will drive profits today; not increased consumer buying power.
Tony Seba’s (video) predictive model is also very interesting. Seba provides a conservative estimate for how fast things are happening. We are now entering the third industrial revolution (video) giving rise to a sharing economy and the fourth industrial revolution which includes AI and autonomous vehicles. Just some of the rising stars of energy disruption now include:
- Li-on Battery Storage
- Autonomous Vehicles
- Business Model Innovation
- Ride Sharing
- 3D Solar
- God Parity
- Other Renewables
Battery storage is making headlines everywhere. In the following video, Joe of Answers with Joe, discusses one of the most promising technologies in this space, the solid state battery, developed by an absolute legend in the battery world, one of the inventors of the lithium ion battery and recent Nobel Prize winner John B. Goodenough
With this new battery and storage technology, energy can be stored as it’s generated, giving national renewable grid operators an instant solution for smoothing demand and bringing domestic micro-generation to hundreds of millions of people.
Also grid parity may be the least of the problems facing utilities. Now we have “god parity” – this is when the cost of electricity generation falls below that of the cost of the network. In The Guardian and for RenewEconomy, it was discussed that this means that even if the cost of coal-fired, gas-fired or nuclear generation (or, for that matter, utility-scale solar or wind) were free, it would be too expensive to compete with solar.
Further, according to Forbes Contributor, Jeff McMahon, “Los Angeles Power and Water officials have struck a deal on the largest and cheapest solar + battery-storage project in the world, at prices that leave fossil fuels in the dust and may relegate nuclear power to the dustbin.”
In a recent video series, Dave Borlace of Just Have A Think (JHAT), discusses even more huge advances in battery storage. A team at Penn State University this week published a paper detailing a revolutionary new battery management system that allows 200 miles of range to be added to a lithium ion EV Battery in just over 8 minutes.
Additionally by 2020 Electric Vehicles (EVs) are expected to begin to flood the market which will bring major disruption to the transportation sector.
“We conclude that the economics of oil for gasoline and diesel vehicles versus wind- and solar-powered EVs are now in relentless and irreversible decline, with far-reaching implications for both policymakers and the oil majors,” writes Lewis. “If all of this sounds far-fetched, then the speed with which the competitive landscape of the European utility industry has been reshaped over the last decade by the rollout of wind and solar power – and the billions of euros of fossil-fuel generation assets that this has stranded – should be a flashing red light on the oil industry’s dashboard.” – Inside EVs
Many of these innovations are making the news now. Still, it is often said that the climate change and energy problem is insurmountable, typically by the fossil and nuclear fuel oligarchs themselves, even as 11,000 scientists sound the alarm. But this tech is throwing an entirely new light on these issues and showing us possibilities for a future we have not yet begun to imagine.
The following new film, “New Ideas New Inventions: Billions in Change 2,” shows how simple life-changing inventions provide clean water, electricity, and improve lives, especially in third world nations.
The Innovation S-Curve of Rapid Adoption
Most of the current experts doing predictions are basing them upon a linear adoption of these technologies by the marketplace. However, no successful technology in history has ever exhibited a linear adoption since the Gutenberg printing press. It has always happened on an exponential S-curve of rapid adoption. Once they hit 2-5% of the marketplace they can quickly overtake incumbent technologies in a few years, months or even weeks.
In the following video, Tony Seba shares his mathematical genius and some secrets on how to do predictive analysis on exponential socioeconomic transitions when it comes to disruption factors and unexpected and rapid adoption of never-before-seen technologies.
Cost is a critical factor when determining whether an energy storage application makes economic sense. At ESS Inc., their mission is to bring to market the cleanest, lowest-cost long-duration energy storage systems. They are a catalyst for a sustainable energy future. Use the ESS Inc. LCOS formula to learn how the pros lower energy storage costs.
Historically, alternatives have faced significant enemies and barriers because they actually costed less. Successful companies approach this threat as a potential opportunity. Ultimately, switching to a resource-based demonetized society will be the only viable way to truly address this issue. In fact, it is quite clear that demonetizing is necessary in order to save the biosphere and all life in it from limitless growth economy. The new tech and renewables have already been significantly impeded by imposters in the nuclear and fossil fuel industries pandling outdated and deadly solutions that cost us all and the Earth much more than we should have ever been willing to pay.
“There are two sides to every story” says energy sector analyst, Dave Froman. He goes on to say that “the story of our transition into the digital autonomous era will be two fold as well. The majority will no longer be required in the production and delivery of most goods and services, but the other side of the coin is that everything just keeps getting cleaner and cleaner and cheaper and cheaper to produce.” This could dismantle business as usual (BAU) (video).
Furthermore, in twenty years when Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation (video) have removed 90% of the workforce as projected by Amazon, Tesla, and other energy sector giants, outdated technologies and the workforce that has sustained them will be made obsolete. This is why Andrew Yang (video), Rutger Bregman, Elon Musk (video) and others are now calling for a universal basic income (UBI).
Ultimately, as theorists such as Jacque Fresco have argued, the secret to getting off ‘BS growth‘ is moving to a demonetized civilization (video). Others have long stood for anarcho-syndacalism as an alternative to relentlessly exploitative limitless growth paradigms. According to these scholars, adopting alternatives is the only intelligent means by which to deal with the dark side of human nature and its inherent predatory greed. It would also allow us to restore dignity, equality, and humanity while at the same time conserving nature and all other life in the biosphere.
Open Source Systems (OSS)
How would it work if technology development was demonetized? Wouldn’t all the workers and developers on these projects just quit and go home? Not so. Examples abound of projects in which humans come together without mercenary rewards to create incredible systems and participate in the most profound human endeavors. One example of this is open source development.
What does “open source” mean? When a project is open source, that means anybody can view, use, modify, and distribute your project for any purpose. These permissions are enforced through an open source license. Open source is powerful because it lowers the barriers to adoption, allowing ideas to spread quickly.
Star Wars Civilization, Stone Aged Emotions
We are linear thinking mammals living in an age of exponential acceleration. The next decade is going to wreak havoc on our socioeconomic system more than the arrival of the first industrial revolution was which was responsible for the collapse of the feudal system that preceded it. We are now entering the fourth industrial revolution. We stand on the precipice of a technological revolution that will fundamentally alter the way we live, work, and relate to one another. In its scale, scope, and complexity, this transformation will be unlike anything humankind has experienced before.
Very often, our stone age brains simply cannot keep up with this new math. The eminent biologist, Edward O. Wilson, argues in a controversial new book that our Stone Age emotions are still at war with our high-tech sophistication.
“We have created a Star Wars civilization, with Stone Age emotions, medieval institutions, and god-like technology. We are terribly confused by the mere fact of our existence, and a danger to ourselves and to the rest of humanity.” – The Social Conquest of Earth
A Cautionary Tale
Things are changing faster now than anytime before in history. As exciting and promising as this is, we must ensure that these techno-fix solutions are truly resource based and sustainable. Further John Zerzan and Derrick Jensen, unique future primitivist thinkers and philosophers of our time, have made very strong arguments that we should heed strong caution on the techno-fix conundrum. In “The Dangers of The Overpopulation Argument and The Myth of Growth” Jensen says wisely, “The only sustainable level of technology is the Stone Age.” Further, Zerzan discusses the murderous technology of the future (video).
Despite the great promise of futuristic tech, there is an equally great danger that it could lead us further into the trap of greenwashing amidst the current business as usual shuffle which relies on a systemically flawed fiat monetary system. New tech cannot solve the issue of sustainability if is inherently invested in infinite growth, mass production, and over-consumption. In short, we need a ‘revolution of nothing‘ that leads us to adopt new and advanced technology while still getting off growth.
Historically, technology has been heavily rebuked in the environmental movement for having gotten us into the climate crisis in the first place. It is often said that these techno-fantasy solutions could worsen our current condition. Many warn that the only green energy is less energy. A “green tech utopia” built on new “sacrifice zones” – often located in the global south and harming indigenous people – to mine all the minerals required by the “green technology” is wrong and won’t work.
Not only that, according to Resilience.org, some of this technology has the potential to distract “from the hard but necessary work of changing the energy system now. Given the risks presented by climate breakdown above 1.5℃ of global heating – possibly just a decade or two away – we cannot afford to back future visions that do not prioritize immediate and large-scale cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.”
The importance of clean energy technology and resource based (video) technology development cannot be underscored enough. This will become a larger question for human civilization going forward as to which of these technologies is really necessary and how they can be made truly sustainable while avoiding the pratfalls of ecomodernism and accelerationism.
Yet, the notion that technology will not impact our future in increasingly valuable and life saving ways is also extremely perilous. We need technology to be better, and knowing that, we have come to rely on it in ways never before thought possible. We simply cannot put the genie back in the bottle.
In so many ways the disruptive energy movement is called upon to do the impossible and on top of that, it must also be sustainable, possibly even self-regenerative, biophilic, and ecologically ethical. It must also somehow reduce our carbon footprint. All of this presents paradoxical challenges that simply do not work given our current socioeconomic system (neoliberalism) and the likelihood that decoupling or accelerated post-capitalism schemes will improve upon this is naive at best.
How much sustainability this new visionary technology can achieve remains to be seen. Ultimately, constraint has always been a driver of disruptive innovation. What clearer constraint could there be than the biophysical limits of our planetary system? The physics of our planetary and ecological systems can no longer be ignored.
Still, those at the top of the technology game like Tesla Motors are already heavily investing in what they see as a clean energy future. Other future thinkers like Steve Cohen, at the University of Columbia say “the growth of the electric vehicle market provides an example of how the transition to a renewable resource based economy will probably take place, particularly if you combine it with the sharing economy.” He says these combined factors have the potential to move us into a sustainable future unlike anything we’ve seen before.
In short, we have entered a new dark age. We don’t have a lot of time (#WeDontHaveTime) considering climate lag, sea level rise, and the multitude of disasters already unfolding due to human-caused climate crisis. It is true now more than ever that, as the saying goes, necessity must be the mother of invention.
- Energy Disruptors
- Atomic-scale Manufacturing Now a Reality
- Dangerous Ideas with Ray Kurzweil | Singularity University
- Noam Chomsky on AI: The Singularity is Science Fiction!
- Can Business and Big Tech Really Bend Their Mighty Practices to Prevent Extinction? Explore Green Swans
- These Companies Are Embracing the Disruptive Innovation of Climate Action | GreenBiz
- Climate Change’s Great Lithium Problem
- Toyota Pushes Ahead With Solid-State Batteries for Future Electric Cars
- The Road to the Autonomous Age … | Forbes
- 2019’s 100 Most Important Interesting and Impactful People in UK Tech | Business Insider
- Bodley, John (1997, seminal work). Victims of progress. Retrieved from https://hpsfaa.wildapricot.org/Resources/Documents/AppliedAnthropologist-1997/fall1997/A%20Critical%20Essay%20on%20John%20H.%20Bodley%E2%80%99s%20Victims%20of%20Progress.pdf
- CNBC (2019). Did we just witness the end of big oil? Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/22/climate-change-did-we-just-witness-beginning-of-end-of-big-oil.html
- Cohen, Steve (2017). Tesla’s model 3 and the transition to sustainability. Retrieved from https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2017/07/31/teslas-model-3-and-the-transition-to-sustainability/
- Dauncey, Guy (2019). OK doomer: a ‘yes it’s possible!’ response to Bill Rees’s ‘realistic’ climate challenge. Retrieved from https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2019/11/25/OK-Doomer-Climate-Challenge-Response/
- GNH Centre (2019). The 9 domains of GNH. Retrieved from http://www.gnhcentrebhutan.org/what-is-gnh/the-9-domains-of-gnh/
- Manning, Jeanne (2019). Hidden Energy. Book
- Scott, Joe (2017). Answers with Joe: the Venus project and the resource-based economy. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYodgWapmgc
- Seba, Tony (2017). Edge of disruption (video). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WwtIPeGnd4
- Saunders, Max (2019). Futurology: how a group of visionaries looked beyond the possible a century ago and predicted today’s world. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/futurology-how-a-group-of-visionaries-looked-beyond-the-possible-a-century-ago-and-predicted-todays-world-118134?fbclid=IwAR2qqg0Y6Z8vksnpw5Y0J7FNiWVYZVKQB_U_grE6YSpiewbjz37YA56Svyw
- Tsakraklides, George (2019). The nothing manifesto: we need a revolution of nothing. Retrieved from https://email@example.com/the-nothing-manifesto-8c1e3061cffc
- You38.org (2019). Transfer fossil fuel subsidies onto solutions.
Retrieved from https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/transfer-fossil-fuel-subsidies-onto-solution-s?just_launched=true&fbclid=IwAR3ZMr1NRYr2PdgvGb-Medru6AQhDNYl4YRXCOdfFTC3wxdTW4mvqtyeRkk
- Zerzan, John (2016). The murderous idolatry of the future: anarcho-primitivism and the end of technology (video). Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/160083053?fbclid=IwAR0tPgbE8B7csGLnLnaSKUA2AL1Q6ArVAGRdHeZDax4BmJvaE14aq1YhlRk
- 2:15 pm Nov. 8, 2019 – Shani Cairns – (Updated and organized Early Disruptors page content, split long sections into 2 separate posts.)
- 10:30 am Nov 3, 2019 – Shani Cairns – (Updated and organized Early Disruptors page content, added JHAT videos and updated graphics.)
- 9:45 pm Oct 31 , 2019 – Shani Cairns – (Updated and organized Early Disruptors page, added resources and discussion.)
- 7:15 pm Sept, 29 , 2019 – Shani Cairns – (Added Early Disruptors page, introductory content outlines, and menu items and content write up. Please note: that this article was written with the assistance of energy sector analyst Dave Froman.)
Note: This page is in a work in progress which will be constantly updated as with all wiki pages. It aims to introduce the topic of early energy sector disruption technologies as they are related to climate change.